| 316 | 0 | 186 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文以阿马蒂亚·森的可行能力理论为基础，从相对比较视角提出动态多维共同富裕等价值测度标准，解决了多维指数中不同维度的可比性问题，设计动态多维共同富裕公理体系并构建测度指数，并进一步证明该指数的公理适应性。基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的实证研究发现，我国6大区域共同富裕状态均有改善，西北地区改善幅度最大，收入、生活水平维度的贡献率较高，需要从有效缩小区域间发展不平衡程度并健全公共服务体系和社会保障体系等方面来促进共同富裕。
Abstract：Based on Amartya Sen's capability theory, this paper proposes a dynamic multidimensional common prosperity and other value measurement standards from a relative comparative perspective, solves the comparability problem of different dimensions in the multidimensional index, designs a dynamic multidimensional common prosperity axiom system and constructs a measurement index, and further proves the axiom adaptability of the index. Based on the empirical data of the China Family Panel Studies(CFPS), the study found that the common prosperity status of the six administrative regions has improved, with the largest improvement in the northwest region, and the contribution rate of income and living standards is relatively high. It is necessary to promote common prosperity by effectively narrowing the imbalance of development between regions and improving the public service system and social security system.
[1]陈岑,沈扬扬,李实,等.关于构建农村相对贫困治理长效机制的若干思考[J].华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022(3):16–25.
[2]陈宗胜,杨希雷.论中国共同富裕测度指标和阶段性进展程度[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(9):79–97.
[3]冯星光,张晓静.贫困测度指标及其评价[J].统计与信息论坛, 2006, 21(3):22–26.
[4]侯亚景.中国农村长期多维贫困的测量,分解与影响因素分析[J].统计研究, 2017, 34(11):86–97.
[5]李金昌,余卫.共同富裕统计监测评价探讨[J].统计研究, 2022, 39(2):3–17.
[6]尚卫平,姚智谋.多维贫困测度方法研究[J].财经研究, 2005, 31(12):88–94.
[7]孙巍,冯星,徐彬.异质性视角下中国农村居民减贫效应研究——基于FGT贫困指数的分解新方法[J].统计研究, 2020, 37(9):44–55.
[8]王小林.中国多维贫困测量:估计和政策含义[J].中国农村经济, 2009(12):4–10.
[9]王小林,冯贺霞. 2020年后中国多维相对贫困标准:国际经验与政策取向[J].中国农村经济, 2020(3):2–21.
[10]徐映梅,张提.贫困缺口总指数的构造,分解与应用[J].统计研究, 2016, 33(7):3–10.
[11] Alkire S, Foster J. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement[R]. OPHI Working Paper, 2007.
[12] Chakravarty S R. A New Index of Poverty[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1983, 6(3):307–313.
[13] Chakravarty S R, Deutsch J, Silber J. On the Watts Multidimensional Poverty Index and Its Decomposition[J]. World Development, 2008, 36(6):1067–1077.
[14] Clark S, Hemming R, Ulph D. On Indices for the Measurement of Poverty[J]. The Economic Journal, 1981, 91(362):515–526.
[15] Cribb J, Waters T, Wernham T, et al. Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK:2022[R]. IFS Report, 2022.
[16] Donaldson D, Weymark J A. Properties of Fixed-population Poverty Indices[J]. International Economic Review, 1986, 27(3):667–688.
[17] Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke E. A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures[J]. Econometrica, 1984, 52(3):761–766.
[18] Foster J E, Shorrocks A F. Subgroup Consistent Poverty Indices[J]. Econometrica, 1991, 27(3):687–709.
[19] Hagenaars A. A Class of Poverty Indices[J]. International Eeconomic Rreview, 1987, 28(3):583–607.
[20] Iglesias K, Suter C, Beycan T, et al. Exploring Multidimensional Well-being in Switzerland:Comparing Three Synthesizing Approaches[J].Social Indicators Research, 2017, 134:847–875.
[21] Kakwani N. On a Class of Poverty Measures[J]. Econometrica, 1980, 48(2):437–446.
[22] Kakwani N, Son H H. Social Welfare Functions and Development[M]. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
[23] Sen A. Poverty:An Ordinal Approach to Measurement[J]. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 1976:219–231.
[24] Tkach K, Gigliarano C. Multidimensional Poverty Index with Dependence-based Weights[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2022, 161(2):843–872.
[25] Tsui K. Multidimensional Poverty Indices[J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2002, 19(1):69–93.
[26] Van Vliet O, Wang C. Social Investment and Poverty Reduction:A Comparative Analysis Across Fifteen European Countries[J]. Journal of Social Policy, 2015, 44(3):611–638.
[27] Watts H W. An Economic Definition of Poverty[R]. On Understanding Poverty, 1969:316–329.
[28] World Bank. A Measured Approach to Ending Poverty and Boosting Shared Prosperity:Concepts, Data, and the Twin Goals[R]. World Bank Working Paper, 2015.
(1)因篇幅所限，具体证明过程以附录1展示，见《统计研究》网站所列附件。下同。
(1)采用6大区域，本研究样本中华北地区包括北京、天津、河北、山西；东北地区包括黑龙江、吉林、辽宁；华东地区包括山东、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、广东、海南；中南地区包括河南、湖北、湖南、安徽、江西；西南地区包括广西、重庆、云南、贵州、四川；西北地区包括内蒙古、陕西、甘肃、青海、宁夏、新疆。
(1)因篇幅所限，各地区各维度对后富指数贡献率以附表1展示。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2025.08.002
中图分类号:F126
引用信息:
[1]阮敬,杨芯,王继田.走向共同富裕：等价值视角下动态多维共同富裕公理性标准及其测度研究[J].统计研究,2025,42(08):19-30.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2025.08.002.
基金信息:
北京市社会科学基金规划项目重点项目“共享发展促进北京中等收入群体提质扩容研究”(23JJA004)