nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2017, 08, v.34;No.311 44-52
生态安全系统稳定性评价研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金重大项目“绿色增长理论与实践的国际比较研究”(71320107006);; 教育部人文社会科学青年项目“面向生态文明建设的旅游生态安全系统作用机理解析及最优演化路径识别”(16YJC630098)资助
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2017.08.004
摘要:

本文将生态系统稳定性的研究理念引入到生态安全系统评价中,选取我国三大海域沿海城市生态安全系统为研究对象,采用结构方程模型分析生态安全系统的运行机制,识别系统内部物质、能量流转的路径及强度;并采用生态网络的研究方法,构建了生态安全系统的物质能量流转的动力学方程,对三大海域沿海城市生态安全系统的状况进行比较。研究结果表明:三大海域沿海城市生态安全系统内部呈现出差异化的框架结构,构建了不同的物质能量的流动网络;南海区域安全系统稳定性处于成熟稳定阶段,东海区域处于发展稳定阶段,黄渤海区域则处于初始不稳定阶段。

Abstract:

This paper introduces the research theory on stability of the ecological system into the assessment research on the ecological safety system. Taking the ecological safety systems in the coastal cities along the Chinese three seas as the research focus,this paper is to analyze the operational mechanism of ecological safety systems,and identifies the flow paths and intensity of the material and energy within these systems. Based on the verified structure of the ecological safety systems and the function coefficients,this paper employs the ecological network analysis method( ENA) to build up the material and energy flow dynamical equations for ecological safety systems and to measure the assessment indicators( channel capacity,system polymerization,system redundancy) on the stability of the ecological safety system in order to conduct an assessment and comparison on the ecological safety systems in the coastal cities. The results show that the ecological safety systems have exposed the differences in their framework structure and build up their own flow networks of materials and energy along these three seas. At the same time,a study shows based on comparison analysis of the stability of the ecological safety systems in the coastal cities along these three seas: the ecological system along the South China Sea is at the stage of mature stability,that along the East China Sea at the stage of developing stability and along the Bo-Yellow Sea at the stage of initial instability.

参考文献

[1]柳新伟,等.生态系统稳定性定义剖析[J].生态学报,2004(11):2635-2640.

[2]李医民,李鑫,华静.基于复杂网络的生态系统稳定性与生态多样性[J].生态学杂志,2014(6):1700-1706.

[3]秦晓楠,卢小丽,武春友.国内生态安全研究知识图谱---基于Citespace的计量分析[J].生态学报,2014(13):3693-3703.

[4]毛齐正,马克明,邬建国.城市生物多样性分布格局研究进展[J].生态学报,2013(4):1051-1064.

[5]J PAtkins,et al.Management of the marine environment:integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIRframework in a systems approach[J].Marine Pollution Bulletin,2011(3):215-226.

[6]I Oman,J Stocker.Climate change as a threat to biodiversity:An application of the DPSIR approach[J].Ecological Economics,2009(6):24-31.

[7]H Haber.Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers,pressures and impacts-A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms[J].Ecological Economics,2009(6):1797-1812.

[8]张智光.人类文明与生态安全:共生空间的演化理论[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2013(7):1-8.

[9]王如松.生态安全·生态经济·生态城市[J].学术月刊,2007(7):5-11.

[10]李向明.基于DPSIR概念模型的山地型旅游区生态健康诊断与调控研究[D]:[博士学位论文].云南:云南大学,2012.

[11]B Ness,SAnderberg,J Olsson.Structuring problems in sustainability science:The multi-level DPSIR framework[J].Geoforum,2010(3):479-488.

[12]K Tscherning,et al.Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making[J].Land Use Policy,2012(11),102-110.

[13]E Smeets,R Weterings.Environmental indicators:typology and overview[J].European Environmental Agency,1999(1):119-133.

[14]B Hannon.Ecological pricing and economic efficiency[J].Ecological Economics,2001(3):19-30.

[15]E B Worthing.Ibp-International Goals[J].Science,1968(3839):313-318.

[16]B D Fath,G Halnes.Cyclic energy pathways in ecological food webs[J].Ecological Modeling,2007(8):17-24.

[17]S R Borrett,B D Fath,B C Patten.Functional integration of ecological networks through pathway proliferation[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,2007(5):98-111.

[18]尹海伟,孔繁花,祈毅.湖南省城市群生态网络构建与优化[J].生态学报,2011(10):2863-2874.

[19]陈春娣,C Meurkd,M Ignatievae.城市生态网络功能性连接辨识方法[J].生态学报,2015(19):6414-6424.

[20]C Hardy,T E Graedel.Industrial ecosystems as food webs[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2002(6):29-38.

[21]郭莉.产业生态网络模式的比较分析:一个实证研究[J].科研管理,2009(4):37-43.

[22]苏敬勤,刁晓纯.基于产业生态网络的中国产业发展研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(S1):154-157.

[23]王云才,刘悦来.城市景观生态网络规划的空间模式应用探讨[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009(9):819-824.

[24]R E Ulanowicz.Quantitative methods for ecological network analysis[J].Computational Biology and Chemistry,2004(6):321-339.

[25]World Commission on Environment and Development.Our Common Future[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1987.55-72.

[26]World Bank.Monitoring Environmental Progress:A Report on Work in Progress[M].Washington D.C:Washington D.CUniversity Press,1995:213-260.

[27]United Nations Environment Programme.Guidelines for AEO Cities Integrated Environmental Assessment and Reporting[M].United Nations Environment Programme,2005.52-143.

[28]颜文涛.城市生态系统健康属性综合评价模型及应用研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007(8):137-145.

[29]周慧杰,周兴,吴良林.区域生态经济建设指标体系设计与实证[J].安徽农业科学,2007(26):8386-8389.

[30]迟国泰,闫达文.基于改进群组G1赋权的生态评价模型及省份实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012(7):1464-1475.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2017.08.004

中图分类号:X826

引用信息:

[1]秦晓楠,程钰.生态安全系统稳定性评价研究[J].统计研究,2017,34(08):44-52.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2017.08.004.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金重大项目“绿色增长理论与实践的国际比较研究”(71320107006);; 教育部人文社会科学青年项目“面向生态文明建设的旅游生态安全系统作用机理解析及最优演化路径识别”(16YJC630098)资助

发布时间:

2017-08-15

出版时间:

2017-08-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文