| 1,105 | 25 | 250 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文探讨P2P投资者在经验积累过程中能否通过学习提高甄别违约风险的能力,并分析其中的传导机制。将投资者对借款标的特征的选择作为其学习结果的代表变量,构建了投资经验通过学习行为影响甄别违约风险能力的理论框架。基于"人人贷"2010-2016年的数据,本文利用中介效应分析方法比较了投资经验对甄别违约风险能力的影响效应在剔除学习效应前后的差异性。结果发现:①投资者投资经验对其甄别违约风险的能力具有正向但边际递减的总影响,且在投资经验均值处为促进作用;②投资经验通过影响学习结果,进而对投资者甄别违约风险的能力产生间接影响;③在分离出经由学习的间接影响后,投资经验对甄别违约风险能力具有负向且边际递增的直接效应,且在投资经验均值处为抑制作用。该直接效应被学习的间接影响遮盖,导致总效应与直接效应呈相反的变化趋势,说明学习行为改变了投资经验影响甄别违约风险能力的非线性形式,从经验学习中投资者可以实现甄别违约风险能力的提升。本文研究对投资者改善投资能力,对监管者规范网络借贷平台信息披露机制、制定投资者教育与保护政策,对P2P网络借贷平台构建良好的平台投资环境,均具有指导意义。
Abstract:In this paper,we investigate whether investors can improve their ability to identify the default risk by learning with experience,and study how this improvement works. Taking the investors' choice of the listing characteristics as the proxy variable of the learning result,we construct a theoretic frame in which investment experience affects investors' ability to identify the default risk through learning the listing characteristics.Based on "Renrendai" 2010-2016 data,we apply the mediation analysis method to analyze the relationship between investment experience and the ability to identify the default risk before and after separating the learning effect. The evidence shows that: 1) investment experience has a positive gross impact on the ability to identify the default risk with diminishing marginal effect and this gross impact is positive at the average investment experience; 2) investment experience has an indirect impact on the ability to identify the default risk by affecting the learning result; 3) after separating this indirect effect, the direct influence of investment experience on the ability to identify the default risk is negative and marginally increasing and this direct impact is negative at the average investment experience. The direct effect is concealed by the indirect effect,resulting in different change trends of the direct effect and the gross effect. Learning from investment experience can change the nonlinear form in which investment experience affects the ability to identify the default risk. This makes it possible for investors to improve their ability to identify the default risk with learning from their previous investment experience. This research provides guidance for investors to improve their abilities,and provides reference for P2P online lending platforms to create better investment environments,as well as policy suggestions for administrators on P2P platform information disclosure regulation, investor education and protection.
[1]杨东.互联网金融的法律规制——基于信息工具的视角[J].中国社会科学,2015(4):107-126,206.
[2]谢平,邹传伟,刘海二.互联网金融的基础理论[J].金融研究,2015(8):1-12.
[3]范超,王磊,解明明.新经济业态P2P网络借贷的风险甄别研究[J].统计研究,2017(2):33-43.
[4]Freedman S,Jin G Z. Learning by Doing with Asymmetric Information:Evidence from Prosper.Com[J]. National Bureau of Economic Research,2011.
[5]王正位,向佳,廖理,等.互联网金融环境下投资者学习行为的经济学分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016(3):95-111.
[6]廖理,向佳,王正位.网络借贷的角色转换与投资者学习效应[J].中国工业经济,2018(9):60-78.
[7]Nicolosi G,Peng L,Zhu N.Do Individual Investors Learn from Their Trading Experience[J]. Journal of Financial Markets,2009(2):317-336.
[8]Seru A,Shumway T,Stoffman N. Learning By Trading[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2010(2):705-739.
[9]谭松涛,陈玉宇.投资经验能够改善股民的收益状况吗——基于股民交易记录数据的研究[J].金融研究,2012(5):164-178.
[10]陈霄,叶德珠,邓洁.借款描述的可读性能够提高网络借款成功率吗[J].中国工业经济,2018(3):174-192.
[11]丁杰,李悦雷,曾燕,等.P2P网贷中双向交易者的双重信息价值及信息传递[J].南开管理评论,2018(2):4-15.
[12]彭红枫,林川.言之有物:网络借贷中语言有用吗?——来自人人贷借款描述的经验证据[J].金融研究,2018(11):133-152.
[13]Chen D,Li X,Lai F.Gender Discrimination in Online Peer-to-Peer Credit Lending:Evidence from a Lending Platform in China[J].Electronic Commerce Research,2017,17.
[14]廖理,吉霖,张伟强.借贷市场能准确识别学历的价值吗?——来自P2P平台的经验证据[J].金融研究,2015(3):146-159.
[15]李晓鑫,曹红辉.信息披露、投资经验与羊群行为——基于众筹投资的研究[J].财贸经济,2016(10):72-86.
[16]Greenwood R,Nagel S. Inexperienced Investors and Bubbles[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2009(2):239-258.
[17]潘越,戴亦一,陈梅婷.基金经理的投资经验、交易行为与股市泡沫[J].中国工业经济,2011(1):120-129.
[18]张春霞,刘淳,廖理.是什么使我们陷入非理性陷阱[J].统计研究,2013(8):92-101.
[19]高铭,江嘉骏,陈佳,等.谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J].金融研究,2017(11):96-111.
[20]李悦雷,郭阳,张维.中国P2P小额贷款市场借贷成功率影响因素分析[J].金融研究,2013(7):126-138.
[21]Chen D,Lin Z. Rational or Irrational Herding in Online Microloan Markets:Evidence from China[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal,2014.
[22]张腾文,王威,于翠婷.金融知识、风险认知与投资收益——基于中小投资者权益保护调查问卷[J].会计研究,2016(7):66-73,97.
[23]Menkhoff L,Schmeling M,Schmidt U. Overconfidence,Experience,and Professionalism:An Experimental Study[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,2013,86:92-101.
[24]Chen X,Shantha K V A,Gamini L P S. A Conceptual Framework on Individual Investors’Learning Behavior in the Context of Stock Trading:An Integrated Perspective[J]. Cogent Economics&Finance,2018.
[25]廖理,李梦然,王正位.中国互联网金融的地域歧视研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014(5):54-70.
[26]张海洋,蔡航.头衔的价值——来自网络借贷的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2018(4):1525-1556.
[27]Serrano-Cinca C,Gutiérrez-Nieto B,López-Palacios L.Determinants of Default in P2P Lending[J]. PLOS ONE,2015(10).
[28]Emekter R,Tu Y,Jirasakuldech B,et al. Evaluating Credit Risk and Loan Performance in Online Peer-to-Peer(P2P)Lending[J].Applied Economics,2015(1):54-70.
[29]廖理,李梦然,王正位.聪明的投资者:非完全市场化利率与风险识别——来自P2P网络借贷的证据[J].经济研究,2014(7):125-137.
[30]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745.
(1)人们的社交活动和经济生产活动多集中于工作期间,故工作地点更能反映人们所处的经济社会环境。
(1)本文没有如王正位等(2016)和廖理等(2018)那样,使用投资次数或距首次投资的时长作为投资经验的代表变量,原因是:投资次数描述的是借贷关系建立的次数,侧重对借贷信息的判断;距首次投资的时长描述的是接触借款信息的时间长度,侧重可获取的信息量。然而,本文侧重对借贷信息的学习过程,不仅包括接收和判断信息的过程,还包括根据投资结果调整判断的过程。因此,累计应收还款次数更适合代表投资经验。
(1)因为人人贷的借款标的从发布到满标的时长较短,借款标的发布时间与相应投资者的投标时间十分接近,所以,这一替代有一定的合理性。
(2)限于篇幅,附录表见《统计研究》网站。下同。
(3)这里以违约意愿反向刻画投资者甄别违约风险的能力,以方程(1)中的系数估计分析投资经验对违约意愿的影响。我们也可以用违约可能性(或违约率,即P(default=1))反向刻画投资者甄别违约风险的能力,如读者对此分析感兴趣,可来信获取相关结果。结果显示,对于本文样本数据,这两种情形的结论是一致的。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.12.004
中图分类号:F724.6;F832.4;F224
引用信息:
[1]周先波,欧阳梦倩.P2P投资经验与甄别违约风险的能力——基于学习的视角[J].统计研究,2019,36(12):40-54.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.12.004.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目“不确定预期和家庭资产配置的联动性:影响机制与联立Tobit研究”(71773146)的资助
2019-12-17
2019-12-17
2019-12-17