| 1,303 | 8 | 121 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
自2008年以来,经济周期平稳化是我国宏观经济运行的基本特征,本文尝试从经济服务化和产业关联的视角对这一现象做出解释。具体而言,本文在工业和服务业两部门动态随机一般均衡模型中引入中间产品使用的产业关联,产业关联的引入使得模型产生了冲击放大机制,而放大机制的大小取决于两部门中间产品投入比例。研究表明,由于工业部门使用更大比例的中间产品,其冲击放大机制更大;而随着经济的服务化,工业部门增加值占比下降则降低了经济整体的冲击放大机制,从而产生了经济波动趋稳的现象。通过两部门中间产品比重的数值模拟,本文证实了冲击放大机制的存在;进而对1995—2007年和2008—2018年之间的模型参数进行校准,并对两个阶段的模型所产生的经济波动性进行分析对比,结论显示,2008年之后服务业对工业的替代导致了更低的经济波动性和更高的宏观经济稳定性。
Abstract:The stabilization of the economic cycle is the basic feature of China's macroeconomic operation. The article attempts to explain this phenomenon from the perspective of economic service-oriented economy and production network. Specifically, this article introduces the production network of the use of intermediate products in the two-sector DSGE model, which creates an amplification mechanism for technological shocks, and the size of the amplification mechanism depends on the proportion of intermediate product inputs in the two sectors. The conclusion shows that because the industrial sector uses a larger proportion of intermediate goods, its shock amplification mechanism is greater; as the economy becomes service-oriented, the decline in the industrial sector's share reduces the overall economic impact amplification mechanism, resulting in economic stabilization. This paper confirms the existence of the shock amplification mechanism through numerical simulation of the proportion of intermediate products in the two sectors. Then we calibrate the model parameters in 1995—2007 and 2008—2018, and make a comparative analysis of the economic fluctuations generated by the two-stage model. The result shows that the substitution of the service industry for the industry after 2008 leads to lower economic volatility and higher macroeconomic stability.
[1]方福前,詹新宇.我国产业结构升级对经济波动的熨平效应分析[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2011(9):5–16.
[2]郭朝先.“互联网+工业”:全球态势与中国发展之路[J].经济研究参考, 2018(8):3–9.
[3]刘继国,李江帆.国外制造业服务化问题研究综述[J].经济学家, 2007(3):119–126.
[4]吕一清,邓翔.产业结构升级如何“熨平”了中国宏观经济波动:基于产业结构内生化的DSGE模型的分析[J].财贸研究, 2018, 29(2):1–10.
[5]徐高.斜率之谜:对中国短期总供给总需求曲线的估计[J].世界经济, 2008(1):47–56.
[6]詹新宇,方福前.国有经济改革与中国经济波动的平稳化[J].管理世界, 2012(3):11–22.
[7]刘志彪,等.产业经济学(第二版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2020.
[8] Horvath M. Sectoral Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2000, 45(1):69–106.
[9] Huang K X, Liu Z. Business Cycles with Staggered Prices and International Trade in Intermediate Inputs[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2007, 54(4):1271–1289.
[10] Kim K Y K. How Important is the Intermediate Input Channel in Explaining Sectoral Employment Comovement over the Business Cycle?[J].Review of Economic Dynamics, 2006, 9(4):659–682.
[11] Long, John B, Plosser, et al. Real Business Cycles[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1983, 91(1):56–78.
[12] Lucas, Robert. Model of Business Cycles[M]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1987.
[13] Lucas R E. Macroeconomic Priorities[J]. American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1):1–14.
[14] Moro A. The Structural Transformation between Manufacturing and Services and the Decline in the U.S. GDP Volatility[R]. Working papers,2012.
[15] Obstfeld, Maurice. Evaluating Risky Consumption Paths:The Role of Intertemporal Substitutability[J]. European Economic Review, 1994,38(7):1471–1486.
[16] Tallarini, Thomas. Risk Sensitive Real Business Cycles[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2000, 45(3):507–532.
[17] Wong C Y, Eng Y K. Vertically Globalized Production Structure in New Keynesian Phillips Curve[J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2010, 21(2):198–216.
(1)因为计算工业和服务业两部门资本存量和全要素生产率(TFP)时需要用到两部门新增固定资产数据,而国家统计局只公开了1995年以来分部门的新增固定资产数据。因此,为了可比性,本文中所有时间序列数据皆以1995年为起点。
(1)详见第二步。
(1)本文中持续性是指与GDP的相关性,以各变量与GDP的相关系数度量;波动性是指冲击造成的两部门增加值的波动幅度,以各变量的方差度量。
(1)表2显示服务业TFP冲击呈下降趋势,且图7也显示服务业中间产品比重扩大对服务业技术冲击的扩大作用较弱。
(1)这里仅考虑服务业比重提高的经济平稳化效应,若加入中间产品使用中服务业中间产品比例的变化,这种平稳化将更为明显。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.03.004
中图分类号:F124
引用信息:
[1]汪川,满向昱.我国经济周期平稳化影响机制研究[J].统计研究,2022,39(03):52-68.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.03.004.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“从制造向服务转型过程中二三产业统筹协调发展的重大问题研究”(20202ZA027)
2022-03-29
2022-03-29
2022-03-29