| 1,103 | 8 | 87 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在国民账户体系(SNA)“常住性原则”下,跨国企业在东道国设立附属机构为当地提供的服务被计入东道国GDP,而该附属机构是母公司为向东道国提供服务或对第三国出口而设立的,其产出具有母公司服务出口的贸易属性,应作为母公司所在国服务贸易。现阶段,对于商业存在服务贸易统计具有二元结构,而由统计口径差异导致的对跨国企业所在母国服务贸易低估问题,受到越来越多学者重视。本文采用含有产权信息的OECD analytical AMNE数据库对由国外附属机构提供的服务贸易进行核算,并在此基础上重新估计各国贸易平衡。结果显示,商业存在模式是服务贸易重要的组成部分,占服务贸易总额的一半以上,忽视商业存在模式贸易将低估全球服务贸易规模;国外附属机构向第三国的服务出口规模逐年扩大,2016年已占国外附属机构产出的22%;中国是全球最大的商业存在模式服务贸易赤字国,日、美是最大的盈余国,忽视商业存在模式服务贸易将夸大中国总顺差规模及中美贸易失衡程度;考虑中美双边商业存在模式服务贸易净值后,中美双边贸易逆差规模将减少12.7%。
Abstract:Under SNA's “permanent resident principle”, the services provided by multinational corporations that set up affiliates in the host country are included in the host country's GDP, instead of the parent company's service export. But it should be included in the trade in services of the home country of the company as the affiliate is set up to provide services to the host country or export to the third country. At this stage, there is a dual structure in the statistics of trade in services of commercial presence and the underestimation of the service trade in the home country of multinational corporations caused by the difference in statistical caliber has attracted more and more scholars' attention. Using the OECD analytical AMNE database, this paper accounts the trade in services in foreign affiliates and re-estimates the trade balance of countries. The analysis indicates that commercial presence is the most important mode in trade in services, taking more than half of total trade in services. Ignoring trade of commercial presence will underestimate the scale of global trade in services. The scale of foreign affiliates' third-country effects are expanding year by year, which account for 22% of foreign affiliates' outputs in 2016. China is the largest deficit country in commercial presence trade in services, while Japan and USA are the top two surplus countries. Ignoring trade in commercial presence would exaggerate the scale of trade surplus in China and the scale of trade imbalance between China and USA. Considering the net bilateral value of trade in commercial presence, the scale of trade imbalance in China and USA could reduce 12.7%.
[1]贾怀勤.在地贸易统计还是属权贸易统计? FDI对传统贸易统计的颠覆及其对策[J].统计研究, 2006, 23(2):40–44.
[2]贾怀勤.按属权原则核算美国服务贸易差额[J].国际贸易问题, 2009(8):75–78.
[3]贾怀勤.属权贸易统计核算的几个基本问题[J].国际贸易问题, 2010(6):30–36.
[4]贾怀勤.中国参与国际贸易核算:回顾与展望[J].国际贸易, 2015(3):14–17.
[5]商务部.中国对外投资发展报告2018[DB/OL]. http://images.mofcom.gov.cn/fec/201901/20190128155348158.pdf.
[6]王亚菲.国际服务贸易统计研究[D].大连:东北财经大学, 2006.
[7]王丹丹.中国国际服务贸易统计改进及其影响评估[J].统计研究, 2009, 26(1):45–49.
[8]“中国国际服务贸易统计研究”课题组,高敏雪,胡景岩.中国国际服务贸易统计建设的背景与基本框架[J].统计研究, 2007, 24(3):90–93.
[9] Andrenelli A, Cadestin C, Backer D K, et al. Multinational Production and Trade in Services[DB/OL]. Paris:OECD Trade Policy Papers, No.212, OECD Publishing, 2018. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/multinational-production-and-trade-in-services_16ec6b55-en.
[10] BEA. An Ownership-based Framework of the U.S. Current Account 2001–2012[DB/OL]. Survey on Current Business, 2014:72–75. https://apps.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2014/01%20January/0114_ownership-based_current_account.pdf.
[11] Cadestin C, Backer D K, Desnoyers-James I, et al. Multinational Enterprises and Global Value Chains:the OECD Analytical AMNE Database[DB/OL]. Paris:OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 211, OECD Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/d9de288d-en.
[12] Cossy M. Cross-border Supply of Services:Pattern of Specific Commitments[C]. Geneva:WTO Symposium on Cross-Border Supply of Services, 2005:28–29.
[13] Deardorff A V, Stern R M. Empirical Analysis of Barriers to International Services Transactions and the Consequences of Liberalization[M].Quantitative Methods for Assessing the Effects of Non-Tariff Measures and Trade Facilitation. 2005:549–609.
[14] Fetzer J, Strassner E. Identifying Heterogeneity in the Production Components of Globally Engaged Business Enterprises in the United States[EB/OL]. BEA, 2015. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/papers/WP2015-13.pdf.
[15] IMF. Balance of Payments and Investment Position Manual[DB/OL]. Sixth Edition. IMF, 2008. https://www.imf.org/exter-nal/pubs/ft/bop/2007/pdf/bpm6.pdf.
[16] Julius D S. Foreign Direct Investment:the Neglected Twin of Trade[M]. Washington, DC:Group of Thirty's Occasional Papers, 1991:1–36.
[17] Karsenty G. Trends in Services Trade under GATS:Recent Developments[C]. Presentation at the Symposium on Assessment of Trade in Services, WTO, 2002:14–15.
[18] Landefeld J S, Whichard O G, Lowe J H. Alternative Frameworks for US International Transactions[J]. Survey of Current Business, 1993,73(12):50–61.
[19] United Nations Statistical Division. World Trade Organization. Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services[M]. 2010.United Nations Publications, 2010.
[20] Wettstein S, Liberatore A, Magdeleine J, et al. A Global Trade in Services Data Set by Sector and by Mode of Supply[DB/OL]. Geneva:World Trade Organization, 2019. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/Tismos_methodology.pdf.
[21] Whichard O G, Lowe J H. An Ownership-based Disaggregation of the U.S. Current Account, 1982–93[J]. Survey of Current Business, 1995,75(10):52–61.
[22] WTO. World Trade Report 2019:the Future of Services Trade[DB/OL]. WTO, 2019. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/00_wtr19_e.pdf.
(1)BEA数据中未细分货物及服务附属机构净收入情况,此处数值为作者按照在外(在美)附属机构中服务企业占比进行的分劈处理结果。
(1)根据OECD针对analytical AMNE数据库的相关说明,对所有权的划分标准基于绝大多数原则,即当一个附属机构中国外所有权达到50 %及以上,则认定其为外资企业(foreign-owned firm),否则为国有企业(domestic-owned firm)。同时,OECD analytical AMNE的domestic MNEs数据库还进一步将国有企业划分为本土企业(nonMNE)和合资企业(MNE)。但由于本文还采用了ICIOMNE等数据库相关数据,其仅按外资企业和国有企业进行了区分,因此,本文对国外附属机构的定义按所有权是否超过50%进行处理。
(2)OECD analytical AMNE数据库根据ISIC Rev.4进行部门分类,总共包括与货物及服务相关的34个部门,其中与服务相关的部门14 个,分别为建筑业(F),批发零售业(G),运输与仓储业(H),住宿和餐饮服务活动(I),出版、音像、广播业(J58T60),通信业(J61),互联网及其他信息服务业(J62T63),金融与保险业(K),房地产业(L),科技及支持类服务活动(MTN),其他科技及支持类服务活动(O),教育业(P),人类健康和社会工作活动(Q),文娱业(RTS)。但由于其他科技及支持类服务活动(O)部门没有数据,所以文中实际核算的服务部门为除此之外的13个部门。
(3)在实际核算过程中,k个部门仅包括上述13个服务部门。
(1)需要注意的是,受到数据可获得性的限制,没有以母国为视角的在外企业出口直接数据,本文采用各国在东道国各部门的外资企业产出占比数据分劈出口数据。因此,存在一个假设,各母国在东道国的外资企业的出口决策一致,即出口总值占总产出的比例一致。
(1)需要注意,本文基于“属权原则”的调整仍存在东道国内各附属机构间贸易无法基于“属权原则”调整的问题,但该数值较小,可以忽略不计。
(2)因篇幅所限,59个经济体2005—2016年贸易平衡调整完整结果以附表1展示,见《统计研究》网站所列附件。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.03.003
中图分类号:F276.7;F746.18
引用信息:
[1]王璟,李昕.跨国企业商业存在模式服务贸易核算及其“第三国效应”研究[J].统计研究,2022,39(03):34-51.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.03.003.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“产品内分工视角下的全球价值链发展对就业创造与分配的影响研究”(71803011); 国家统计局2017年投入产出课题“贸易摩擦对中国经济影响分析”(07)
2022-02-28
2022-02-28
2022-02-28