| 1,850 | 53 | 514 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文基于开放经济框架构建了包含央行外汇干预、投资者情绪与汇率变动的内生动态系统,从理论层面阐述了三者传导的微观机制。理论分析表明,央行外汇干预、投资者情绪与汇率变动之间存在非线性的内生联动效应。为刻画这一效应,本文选取TVP-SV-BVAR模型分别从全局性及多重情景进行实证分析,研究发现:央行外汇干预能够在短期内起到稳定人民币汇率的作用,但在长期会加剧汇率波动。同时,央行外汇干预短期内会加剧投资者情绪波动而使得干预效果减弱,但在长期投资者情绪对汇率的影响不明显。鉴于央行外汇干预对汇率稳定的有效性逐渐下降,且投资者情绪对汇率的冲击易受非预期外部环境的影响。因此,随着人民币汇率形成机制的不断完善,如何在审慎、适当的外汇干预中保持投资者情绪稳定,进而实现人民币汇率在合理均衡的区间内波动应成为制定货币政策时需要考虑的一项重要内容。
Abstract:This paper constructs an endogenous dynamic system including central bank intervention, investor sentiment and exchange rate fluctuation under the open economic framework, and illustrates the micro-transmission mechanisms among the three variables from the theoretical perspective. The theoretical analysis shows that there is non-linear endogenous relationship among foreign exchange intervention, investor sentiment and exchange rate fluctuation. In order to measure the endogenous effects among our concerned variables, we apply TVP-SV-BVAR model to undertake empirical analysis from a global and from multiple scenarios, respectively. We find that the foreign exchange intervention can stabilize the RMB exchange rate in the short term, but will aggravate the fluctuation of exchange rate in the long run. At the same time, the central bank foreign exchange intervention can increase the volatilities of investor sentiment, and thus may weaken the intervention effectiveness in the short term. Note that the direct impact of investor sentiment on the exchange rate is not obvious in the long run. Generally, the effectiveness of central bank foreign exchange intervention on exchange rate stabilization is gradually declining, and the impacts of investor sentiment on exchange rates will easily be affected by externally unexpected factors. In view of this, with the improvement of the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism, monetary authority should seriously consider how to guide investor sentiment and further achieve its stability and thus to keep exchange rate fluctuating within a reasonable and balanced range by implementing prudential and appropriate foreign exchange interventions.
[1]B S Bernanke, K N Kuttner. What Explains the Stock Market’s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(3): 1221-1257.
[2]Mussa M. The Role of Official Intervention[M]. Group of Thirty Press, New York, 1981.
[3]K Rogoff. On the Effects of Sterilized Intervention: An Analysis of Weekly Data[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1984(14): 133-150.
[4]H Kamil. Is Central Bank Intervention Effective Under Inflation Targeting Regimes? The Case of Colombia[R]. IMF Working Paper, 2008.
[5]陈华.央行干预使得人民币汇率更加均衡了吗?[J].经济研究,2013 (12):81-92.
[6]司登奎,江春,李小林.基于汇率预期与央行外汇干预的汇率动态决定:理论分析与经验研究[J].统计研究,2016 (9):13-21.
[7]江春,司登奎,李小林.基于拓展泰勒规则汇率模型的人民币汇率动态决定:理论分析与经验研究[J].金融研究,2018(2):82-99.
[8]张斌.人民币均衡汇率:简约一般均衡下的单方程模型研究[J].世界经济,2003(11):3-12.
[9]M Beine, P D Grauwe, Grimaldi M. The Impact of FX Central Bank Intervention in a Noise Trading Framework[J]. CESifo Working Paper, No. 1520, 2015.
[10]李艳丽,李辰阳.央行干预导致了人民币汇率均衡还是失衡?——基于STR模型的综合效应分析[J].世界经济研究,2016(7):13-26.
[11]M D D Evans, R K Lyons. Do Currency Markets Absorb News Quickly?[J].Journal of International Money and Finance, 2005(2): 197-217.
[12]M R King, et al. The Market Microstructure Approach to Foreign Exchange: Looking Back and Looking Forward [J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2013(38):95-119.
[13]J French. Asset Pricing with Investor Sentiment: On the Use of Investor Group Behavior to Forecast ASEAN Markets [J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2017(42):124-148.
[14]R Dieci, F Westerhoff. Heterogeneous Speculators, Endogenous Fluctuations and Interacting Markets: A Model of Stock Prices and Exchange Rates [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010(4): 743-764.
[15]M Baker, J Wurgler. Investor Sentiment and the Cross-section of Stock Returns [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006(4): 1645-1680.
[16]马晓逵,孙杰.中国股票市场投资者情绪综合指数的构建[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2012 (6):89-95.
(1)在划分短期、中期和长期的依据上,不同学者所选取的步长不尽一致,本文设定预测步长h=1、2、3,分别代表短期、中期和长期。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2018.11.005
中图分类号:F832.6
引用信息:
[1]司登奎,李小林,江春.央行外汇干预、投资者情绪与汇率变动[J].统计研究,2018,35(11):58-70.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2018.11.005.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金青年项目“双向开放条件下金融政策对企业投融资行为的影响研究”(16CJY069)的资助