| 13,646 | 392 | 36 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文基于国泰安数据库和中国专利数据库的合并数据,以《万家企业节能低碳行动实施方案》(以下简称"节能低碳"政策)作为准自然实验,实证分析了"节能低碳"政策带来的环境规制效应对企业绿色创新能力的影响。研究结果显示,"节能低碳"政策对企业绿色创新能力有显著的促进作用,并且这一结论在一系列稳健性检验和排他性检验后仍然成立。异质性检验表明,"节能低碳"政策对企业绿色创新能力的影响存在异质性,其中对东部和中部地区、技术密集型行业、大型企业和成熟期企业的促进作用更明显,而该效应在国有企业和非国有企业之间没有显著差异。本研究还发现,"节能低碳"政策引致的创新补偿效应大于遵循成本效应,据此从环境规制视角解释了企业绿色创新能力提升的事实与机制。本文的研究为如何合理利用环境政策推进企业绿色创新能力提供了重要的政策启示。
Abstract：By merging China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database and Chinese Patent Database,this paper takes China 's Ten Thousand Enterprise Energy-saving and Low-carbon Program implemented in 2011 as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate the environmental regulation effect on firms' green innovation capability. Empirical results show that this energy-saving and low-carbon policy significantly improves firms' green innovation capability,and this result is robust to a series of robustness and exclusiveness checks. Moreover,the impact of the policy is heterogeneous: the positive impact is more profound in eastern and central regions,skill-intensive sectors,large firms as well as firms during a mature stage,with no significant difference between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises. Our extended analysis shows the innovation compensation effects induced by the energy-saving and low-carbon policy are higher than the abatement cost effects,which explains the theoretical mechanism of environmental regulation promoting green innovation. Our research provides an important policy implication on how to utilize environmental policies to promote the green innovation capability of firms.
[1]董直庆，王辉．环境规制的“本地—邻地”绿色技术进步效应[J]．中国工业经济，2019(1):100-118.
[2]郭进．环境规制对绿色技术创新的影响:“波特效应”的中国证据[J]．财贸经济，2019(3):147-160.
[3]景维民，张璐．环境管制、对外开放与中国工业的绿色技术进步[J]．经济研究，2014(9):34-47.
[4]齐绍洲，林屾，崔静波．环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?:基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J]．经济研究，2018(12):129-140.
[5]王雯岚，许荣．高校校友联结促进公司创新的效应研究．中国工业经济，2020,(8):156-174.
[6]杨威，赵仲匡，宋敏．多元化并购溢价与企业转型[J]．金融研究，2019(5):115-131.
[7]余东华，孙婷．环境规制、技能溢价与制造业国际竞争力[J]．中国工业经济，2017(5):35-53.
[8]Acemoglu D,Aghion P,Bursztyn L,et al. The Environment and Directed Technical Change[J]. American Economic Review,2012,102(1):131-166.
[9]Amore M D,Bennedsen M. Corporate Governance and Green Innovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2016,75(1):54-72.
[10]Bu M L,Qiao Z Z,Liu B. Voluntary Environmental Regulation and Firm Innovation in China[J]. Economic Modelling,2020,89(3):10-18.
[11]Chakraborty P,Chatterjee C. Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India[J].Research Policy,2017,46(5):939-955.
[12]Dean T J,Brown R L,Stango V. Environmental Regulation as a Barrier to the Formation of Small Manufacturing Establishments:A Longitudinal Examination[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2000,40(1):56-75.
[13]Funfgelt J,Schulze G G. Endogenous Environmental Policy for Smal l Open Economies with Transboundary Pollution[J]. Economic Modelling,2016(57):294-310.
[14]Kesidou E,Lichao W. Stringency of Environmental Regulation and Eco-innovation:Evidence from the Eleventh Five-Year Plan and Green Patents[J]. Economics Letters,2020(190):109090.
[15]Hering L,Poncet S. Environmental Policy and Exports:Evidence from Chinese Cities[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2014,68(2):296-318.
[16]Rogge K S,Schneider M,Hoffmann V H. The Innovation Impact of the EU Emission Trading System-Findings of Company Case Studies in the German Power Sector[J]. Ecological Economics,2011,70(3):513-523.
[17]Shi X,Xu Z. Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports:Evidence from the Eleventh Five-Year Plan in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2018(89):187-200.
[18]Testa F,Iraldo F,Frey M. The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Firms’Competitive Performance:The Case of the Building and Construction Sector in Some EU Regions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92(9):2136-2144.
[19]Wang Y,Sun X X,Guo X. Environmental Regulation and Green Productivity Growth:Empirical Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD Industrial Sectors[J]. Energy Policy,2019,132:611-619.
[20]Wurlod J D,Noailly J. The Impact of Green Innovation on Energy Intensity:An Empirical Analysis for 14 Industrial Sectors in OECD Countries[J]. Energy Economics,2018(71):47-61.
[21]Xie R,Yuan Y,Huang J. Different Types of Environment Regulation and Heterogeneous Influence on“Green”Productivity:Evidence from China[J]. Ecological Economics,2017(132):104-112.
[22]Yuan R L,Wen W. Managerial Foreign Experience and Corporate Innovation[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2018(48):752-77.
[23]Zhuge L Q,Richard B F,Matthew T H. Regulation and Innovation:Examining Outcomes in Chinese Pollution Control Policy Areas[J]. Economic Modelling,2019,89(3):19-31.
(1)CSMAR数据库网址:https://www.gtarsc.com/
(2)中国专利数据库网址:http://hfiac1dafc7a5644b4ca7hf5pwkkwo56oq6kkf.fcyh.libproxy.ruc.edu.cn/product?lid=9228&sid=922801&tid=922801
(1)因篇幅所限，平行趋势检验结果以附表1展示，详见《统计研究》网站所列附件。
(1)空气流通系数为地面以上10米风速与大气边界层高度的乘积，相关指标来自于ECMWF发布的栅格气象数据。
(2)该制度在国家环境保护总局(现为国家生态环境部)印发的《关于加强和改进环境统计工作的意见》中提及。
(1)本文亦根据《工业和信息化部、国家统计局、国家发展和改革委员会、财政部关于印发中小企业划型标准规定的通知》，将从业人员小于1000人的定义为小型企业，将1000人及以上的定义为大型企业。按照这一划分标准，样本期内大约有70%的上市公司属于大型企业，相关的异质性检验所得结论与正文一致。
(1) CSMAR数据库只统计了2007年之后的研发数据，对于2006年的相关数据主要采用工业企业数据库中的研发投入统计值。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.07.006
中图分类号:X32;F273.1
引用信息:
[1]邓玉萍,王伦,周文杰.环境规制促进了绿色创新能力吗?——来自中国的经验证据[J].统计研究,2021,38(07):76-86.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.07.006.
基金信息:
湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“湘江新区辐射带动能力评价及提升对策研究”(18JL02); 中央专项基本科研业务费项目“环境规制对企业出口行为的影响研究”(531118010460)