nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2011, 10, v.28;No.240 76-83
出口企业转型与企业的经营表现
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金(08CJL025);; 教育部基金项目(08JA790071;10YJC790006),教育部研究生创新计划项目((190)H0509015)的资助
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2011.10.011
发布时间: 2011-10-15
出版时间: 2011-10-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

文章运用基于倍差法的倾向评分匹配估计方法从企业微观层面分析了出口企业转型对其经营表现的作用。结果表明:高度外销型企业转型为中度外销型企业以及中度外销型企业转型为低度外销型企业对企业经营表现的影响主要体现在会显著地增加企业的负债额进而恶化其财务状况,二者不显著影响企业的劳动生产率和产出。高度外销型企业转型为低度外销型企业对企业经营表现的影响主要体现在会显著地提高企业的劳动生产率,这种转型行为并不显著影响企业的产出和财务状况。尽管如此,由于其对企业的产出并不产生显著作用,因此由于该转型行为所获得的劳动生产率的提升同时也会减少企业的就业。

Abstract:

We apply a difference-in differences methodology based on Kernel Propensity Score Matching to analyze the performance dynamics of exporters in Chinese industry sector that experienced transformation in export activities.The highly exporting firms lowering their export intensities to turn into moderate ones or the moderate exporting firms to turn into lowly ones would have a deleterious effect on firms' performance dynamics especially on financial situation through significantly increase the amount of firms' debt.Such two transformation behaviors have no significant effects either on firms' productivity or on their output dynamics.By contrast,the highly exporting firms lowering their export intensities by leaps and bounds to turn into lowly ones would generate a positive effect on firms' performance dynamics especially on labor productivity variations.Such transformation behavior dose not significantly affect firms' financial situation and output dynamics.Therefore,the transformation behavior will also reduce the firms' employment with obtaining the labor productivity improvement.

参考文献

[1]陆铭,范子英.中国出口导向路径不会有根本改变[N].上海证券报,2009-09-22.

[2]R Dehejia,S Wahba.Causal effects in nonexperimental studies:Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs[J].Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association,1994(488):1053-1062.

[3]J Heckman,H Ichimura,J Smith,et al.Matching as an econometricevaluation estimator:evidence from evaluating a job trainingprogramme[J].Review of Economic Studies,1997(64):44-46.

[4]克鲁格曼,奥伯斯法尔德.国际经济学[M].海闻,刘伟,秦琦等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.

[5]H Fryges,J Wagner.Exports and productivity growth:First evidencefrom a continuous treatment approach[J].Review of WorldEconomics,2008(144):695-722.

[6]R Blundell,M C Dias.Evaluation methods for non-experimental data[J].Fiscal Studies,2000(109):367-398.

[7]J Smith,P Todd.Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique ofnonexperimental estimators?[J].Journal of Econometrics,2005a(125):305-353.

[8]A Abadie,G Imbens.On the failure of the bootstrap for matchingestimators[J].Mimeo,Kennedy School of Government,HarvardUniversity,2005a.

[9]D O Gilligan,J Hoddionott.Using community targeting to providedrought relief:Evidence from Ethiopia[J].International Food PolicyResearch Institute,2006.

[10]J Dinardo,J Tobias.Nonparametric density and regression estimation[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2001(15):11-28.

[11]J Smith,P Todd.Rejoinder[J].Journal of Econometrics,2005b(125):365-375.

[12]P Rosenbaum,D Rubin.The central role of the propensity score inobservational studies for causal effects[J].Biometrika,1983(70):41-50.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2011.10.011

中图分类号:F752.62;F279.2;F224

引用信息:

[1]邵敏,包群.出口企业转型与企业的经营表现[J].统计研究,2011,28(10):76-83.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2011.10.011.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金(08CJL025);; 教育部基金项目(08JA790071;10YJC790006),教育部研究生创新计划项目((190)H0509015)的资助

发布时间:

2011-10-15

出版时间:

2011-10-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文