| 1,273 | 2 | 820 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
农业规模经营是我国农业强国建设的重要动能。依托农机服务市场发育推进服务规模经营已得到学术界的广泛认同,但服务规模经营会给传统的农地规模经营路径带来何种改变尚不明晰。本文将两类农业规模经营路径纳入同一分析框架,采用5轮中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据,考察农机服务市场发育对农地流转的影响。研究表明,第一,农机服务市场发育会促进农户转入农地和抑制农户转出农地,且通过提升农户的农业生产效率来影响其农地流转行为;第二,农机服务市场发育对农户扩大农地经营规模的促进作用在获得农业补贴和未自购农机的农户中更明显;第三,农机服务市场发育能够促进农户农地流转有偿化;第四,对于未融入农业机械化进程的农户而言,农机服务市场发育会促使其转出农地,但其不会因此退出农业经营。上述结果表明服务规模经营能够对农地规模经营起到带动作用,但这一带动作用又具有不彻底性。本文揭示了服务规模经营与农地规模经营协同发展的可行性,为完善推进农业规模经营的相关政策提供实证依据。
Abstract:Agricultural scale management is an important driving force for China to build up its strength in agriculture. The significance of facilitating service scale management through the development of agricultural machinery service market has been widely recognized by academia. However, it is still not clear what changes service scale management will bring to the traditional farmland scale management path. This paper includes two types of agricultural scale management paths in the same analytical framework, and adopts five rounds of China Family Panel Studies data to investigate the impact of the development of agricultural machinery service market on farmland transfer. The results show that, firstly, the development of agricultural machinery service market encourages rural households to transfer in farmland while discouraging them from transferring out their farmland, and it affects their farmland transfer behavior by improving the efficiency in agricultural production. Secondly, the promotional effect of the development of agricultural machinery service market on rural households' expansion of farmland management scale is more obvious among those who have received agricultural subsidies and those who haven't purchase agricultural machinery on their own. Thirdly, the development of agricultural machinery service market contributes to rural households' compensation-based farmland transfer. Fourthly, for rural households that have no access to agricultural mechanization, the development of agricultural machinery service prompts them to transfer out farmland, but it may not result in their withdrawal from agricultural management. The above results show that service scale management can play a role in promoting farmland scale management, and this promotional effect is inexhaustive at the same time. This paper reveals the feasibility of the coordinated development of service scale management and farmland scale management, which provides empirical evidences to improve policies aiming at promoting agricultural scale.
[1]陈锡文.当前农业农村的若干重要问题[J].中国农村经济, 2023(8):2-17.
[2]盖庆恩,李承政,张无坷,等.从小农户经营到规模经营:土地流转与农业生产效率[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(5):135-152.
[3]高雪莲,李阳阳.农业跑步机理论:研究述评与中国实践[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 36(2):35-43.
[4]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
[5]康晨,刘家成,徐志刚.农业生产外包服务对农村土地流转租金的影响[J].中国农村经济, 2020(9):105-123.
[6]匡远配,陆钰凤.我国农地流转“内卷化”陷阱及其出路[J].农业经济问题, 2018(9):33-43.
[7]李宁,周琦宇,汪险生.新型农业经营主体的角色转变研究:以农机服务对农地经营规模的影响为切入点[J].中国农村经济, 2020(7):40-58.
[8]李庆海,李锐,王兆华.农户土地租赁行为及其福利效果[J].经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(1):269-288.
[9]刘守英,王瑞民.农业工业化与服务规模化:理论与经验[J].国际经济评论, 2019(6):9-23.
[10]罗必良.论服务规模经营——从纵向分工到横向分工及连片专业化[J].中国农村经济, 2017(11):2-16.
[11]罗良清,刘钰,王亚菲.迈向农业强国——现代农业产业链供应链的形成驱力、典型路径与收入效应[J].统计研究, 2025, 42(6):3-20.
[12]朋文欢,李寒凝,傅琳琳,等.新型经营主体发育对农地有偿流转的影响机制研究——来自中国农村家庭追踪调查的证据[J].中国土地科学, 2022, 36(12):58-68.
[13]彭新宇.农业服务规模经营的利益机制——基于产业组织视角的分析[J].农业经济问题, 2019(9):74-84.
[14]吴偎立,郑梦圆,平新乔.论农业生产托管与土地流转[J].经济科学, 2022(6):142-159.
[15]许庆,杨青,张霄.农业投资与土地流转价格——基于地租理论视角[J].统计研究, 2024, 41(11):104-116.
[16]许庆,尹荣梁,章辉.规模经济、规模报酬与农业适度规模经营——基于我国粮食生产的实证研究[J].经济研究, 2011, 46(3):59-71.
[17]闫桂权,何玉成,张晓恒.数字普惠金融发展能否促进农业机械化——基于农机作业服务市场发展的视角[J].农业技术经济, 2022(1):51-64.
[18]杨子,饶芳萍,诸培新.农业社会化服务对土地规模经营的影响——基于农户土地转入视角的实证分析[J].中国农村经济, 2019(3):82-95.
[19]杨子砚,文峰.从务工到创业农地流转与农村劳动力转移形式升级[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(7):171-185.
[20]俞培果,蒋葵.农业科技投入的价格效应和分配效应探析[J].中国农村经济, 2006(7):54-62.
[21]章丹,徐志刚,刘家成.外包与流转:作业服务规模化是否延缓农地经营规模化——基于要素约束缓解与地租上涨的视角[J].中国农村观察, 2022(2):19-38.
[22]郑淋议,钱文荣.农地确权对农民市民化的影响研究[J].统计研究, 2024, 41(2):114-126.
[23]朱文珏,罗必良.行为能力、要素匹配与规模农户生成——基于全国农户抽样调查的实证分析[J].学术研究, 2016(8):83-92.
[24] Cochrane W W. Farm Prices:Myth and Reality[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1958.
[25] Hayami Y, Herdt R W. Market Price Effects of Technological Change on Income Distribution in Semisubsistence Agriculture[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1977, 59(2):245-256.
[26] Hayami Y, Ruttan V W. Factor Prices and Technical Change in Agricultural Development:The United States and Japan, 1880—1960[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1970, 78(5):1115-1141.
[27] Wang X, Yamauchi F, Otsuka K, et al. Wage Growth, Landholding, and Mechanization in Chinese Agriculture[J]. World Development, 2016,86:30-45.
[28] Young A. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress[J]. The Economic Journal, 1928, 38(152):527-542.
[29] Zhang J, Mishra A K, Zhu P, et al. Land Rental Market and Agricultural Labor Productivity in Rural China:A Mediation Analysis[J]. World Development, 2020, 135:105089.
(1)数据来源于原农业部农村经济体制与经营管理司、农业部农村合作经济经营管理总站编写的《中国农村经营管理统计年报(2015年)》,以及农业农村部政策与改革司编写的《2023年中国农村政策与改革统计年报》。
(2)东亚小农生产格局是指在人多地少的资源禀赋条件下,小规模家庭农业成为东亚农业生产的主要形态,过密化的劳动力投入导致边际报酬递减。
(1)CFPS2014提供了农户是否拥有农机的信息,但未进一步调查农机价值。本文采取的处理方法是,对于当年拥有农机的农户,参照CFPS2016补齐农机价值数据。
(2)CFPS2016—2022未涉及村庄层面的信息,因此本文从CFPS2014中匹配获取。
(1)因篇幅所限,稳健性检验结果以附表1~4展示,见《统计研究》网站所列附件。下同。
(1)因篇幅所限,Bivariate Probit模型基本表达式和被解释变量赋值方法分别以附录1和附表5展示。
(1)因篇幅所限,影响渠道检验结果以附表6展示。
(2)关于农户是否获得农业补贴,考虑到CFPS2016—2022没有进一步区分各类政府补贴,本文参照CFPS2014进行分组。
(3)因篇幅所限,对农地流转有偿化的检验结果以附表7展示。
(1)因篇幅所限,对农业跑步机逻辑的检验结果以附表8展示。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2025.10.008
中图分类号:F321.1;F324.2
引用信息:
[1]周旭海,罗崇佳,张清勇.农机服务市场发育对农地流转的影响——基于农业规模经营的视角[J].统计研究,2025,42(10):106-118.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2025.10.008.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“部门利益、官僚结构与政策的制定和执行——以中国若干重大土地政策为例”(72074216); 中国社会科学院“青启计划”资助“东亚农业规模经营路径研究”(2025QQJH82)
2025-10-25
2025-10-25