| 5,237 | 40 | 643 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
网络基础设施作为数字经济发展的“中枢节点”和“传输纽带”,对激活城市包容性增长与绿色偏向发挥着重要作用。本文将宽带中国战略视为网络基础设施的外生政策冲击,并利用修正后的引力模型、非期望产出的Super-EBM模型,对知识流动与包容性绿色增长效率进行测算。在此基础上,从知识流动视角对网络基础设施建设与城市包容性绿色增长的关系进行深入探索。研究发现,第一,网络基础设施建设对城市包容性绿色增长具有显著促进作用,且该作用在非资源型城市更为明显;第二,知识流动是网络基础设施促进城市包容性绿色增长的重要中介机制,该中介机制通过地形起伏度、方言多样性指数等工具变量系统识别后仍然成立;第三,绿色创新与创业活力是网络基础设施驱动城市包容性绿色增长的调节中介机制,两者均能够强化知识流动对城市包容性绿色增长的促进作用;第四,城市间知识流动能够进一步推进市场有效整合,使得网络基础设施对城市包容性绿色增长的机制影响存在明显的链式传导作用。上述结论更深层次地打开了知识流动传导机制黑箱,能够为网络基建规划与城市转型方案提供重要借鉴和政策启示。
Abstract:Network infrastructure, as the central node and transmission link for the development of the digital economy, plays an important role in activating the inclusive growth and green bias of cities. The article considers the broadband China strategy as an exogenous policy shock to network infrastructure and measures the efficiency of knowledge flows and inclusive green growth using a modified gravity model and a Super-EBM model with non-expected outputs. Based on the above, the relationship between network infrastructure construction and inclusive green growth in cities is explored in depth from the perspective of knowledge flow. It finds that, firstly, network infrastructure construction plays a significant role in promoting inclusive green growth in cities, which is more obvious in non-resource-based cities. Secondly, knowledge flow is an important mediating mechanism for network infrastructure to promote inclusive green growth in cities, which still holds after being systematically identified by instrumental variables such as topographic relief and dialect diversity index. Thirdly, green innovation and entrepreneurial vitality are moderating mediators of network infrastructure driving inclusive green growth in cities, both of which can enhance the contribution of knowledge flows to inclusive green growth in cities. Fourthly, inter-city knowledge flow can further promote effective market integration, which makes the mechanism of the impact of network infrastructure on urban inclusive green growth have a significant chain transmission effect. The conclusions unlock the transmission mechanism of knowledge flow and provide reference and policy implications for the further planning of network infrastructure construction and city transformation programs.
[1]白俊红,王钺,蒋伏心,等.研发要素流动、空间知识溢出与经济增长[J].经济研究, 2017, 52(7):109–123.
[2]曹跃群,郭鹏飞,杨玉玲.网络基础设施投入对区域经济高质量增长的影响研究——基于生产性资本存量的估算[J].管理评论, 2022,34(3):19–30, 54.
[3]封志明,唐焰,杨艳昭,等.中国地形起伏度及其与人口分布的相关性[J].地理学报, 2007(10):1073–1082.
[4]韩晶,姜如玥.数字经济赋能低碳发展:理论逻辑与实践路径[J].统计研究, 2024, 41(4):54–67.
[5]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济, 2022(5):100–120.
[6]李华,董艳玲.中国经济高质量发展水平及差异探源——基于包容性绿色全要素生产率视角的考察[J].财经研究, 2021, 47(8):4–18.
[7]李婧,何宜丽.基于空间相关视角的知识溢出对区域创新绩效的影响研究——以省际数据为样本[J].研究与发展管理, 2017, 29(1):42–54.
[8]刘传明,马青山.网络基础设施建设对全要素生产率增长的影响研究——基于宽带中国战略的准自然实验[J].中国人口科学, 2020(3):75–88, 127–128.
[9]吕有金,高波,孔令池.国内市场整合与绿色全要素生产率——非线性关系及门槛效应检验[J].经济问题探索, 2021(8):19–30.
[10]盛斌,毛其淋.贸易开放、国内市场一体化与中国省际经济增长:1985—2008年[J].世界经济, 2011(11):44–66.
[11]苏屹,林周周.自有知识、知识溢出与区域创新产出[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(1):168–176.
[12]涂心语,严晓玲.数字化转型、知识溢出与企业全要素生产率——来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].产业经济研究, 2022(2):43–56.
[13]魏下海,韦庆芳.通往农村共同富裕之路:网络基础设施建设与相对贫困缓解[J].统计研究, 2023, 40(6):134–144.
[14]肖涵月,孙慧,王慧,等.从“试点”到“扩散”:低碳城市试点的包容性低碳增长效应分析[J].产业经济研究, 2022(3):28–40.
[15]徐现祥,刘毓芸,肖泽凯.方言与经济增长[J].经济学报, 2015, 2(2):1–32.
[16]薛成,孟庆玺,何贤杰.网络基础设施建设与企业技术知识扩散——来自“宽带中国”战略的准自然实验[J].财经研究, 2020, 46(4):48–62.
[17]于井远.税制结构优化与地区经济增长质量——基于包容性全要素生产率视角[J].经济评论, 2022(2):36–50.
[18]湛泳,李珊.智慧城市建设、创业活力与经济高质量发展——基于绿色全要素生产率视角的分析[J].财经研究, 2022, 48(1):4–18.
[19]张杰,付奎.信息网络基础设施建设能驱动城市创新水平提升吗?——基于“宽带中国”战略试点的准自然试验[J].产业经济研究,2021(5):1–14, 127.
[20]张勋,万广华,张佳佳,等.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究, 2019, 54(8):71–86.
[21]赵林,刘焱序,曹乃刚,等.中国包容性绿色效率时空格局与溢出效应分析[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3):382–396.
[22]赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65–76.
[23]赵星.新型数字基础设施的技术创新效应研究[J].统计研究, 2022, 39(4):80–92.
[24]张艳,郑贺允,葛力铭.资源型城市可持续发展政策对碳排放的影响[J].财经研究, 2022, 48(1):49–63.
[25] De Chaisemartin C, D’ Haultfoeuille X. Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects[J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110(9):2964–2996.
[26] Dong F, Li Y, Qin C, et al. Information Infrastructure and Greenhouse Gas Emission Performance in Urban China:A Difference-in-Differences Analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 316:115252.
[27] Lin W T, Shao B B M. The Business Value of Information Technology and Inputs Substitution:The Productivity Paradox Revisited[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2006, 42(2):493–507.
[28] Ren S, Li L, Han Y, et al. The Emerging Driving Force of Inclusive Green Growth:Does Digital Economy Agglomeration Work?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, 31(4):1656–1678.
[29] Romer P M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(5):1002–1037.
[30] Xiang X, Yang G, Sun H. The Impact of the Digital Economy on Low-Carbon, Inclusive Growth:Promoting or Restraining[J]. Sustainability,2022, 14(12):7187.
(1)因篇幅所限,平行趋势检验和安慰剂检验结果分别以附图1、附图2展示,内生性检验结果以附表1展示,见《统计研究》网站所列附件。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2024.08.007
中图分类号:F49;F124.5
引用信息:
[1]马茜,廖甍,张红兵.网络基础设施建设、知识流动与城市包容性绿色增长——基于调节中介与链式中介的综合分析框架[J].统计研究,2024,41(08):98-111.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2024.08.007.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“新使命驱动下黄河流域创新生态系统的绿色转向与协同演化研究”(20BJY040); 教育部社会科学司青年项目“数字基础设施影响企业全要素生产率提升的双重效应、多维机制与情境差异研究”(21YJC790040)
2024-08-25
2024-08-25