nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2019, 03, v.36;No.330 88-99
地理距离、方言文化与劳动力空间流动
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国经济特区创新驱动发展的金融支持研究”(14JJD790041)的资助
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.03.008
摘要:

本文基于百度迁徙大数据研究我国劳动力的空间流动,系统考察地理和文化对劳动力流动的影响。通过构造流动机会比率,基于引力模型和普通最小二乘法的研究表明地理距离和方言距离阻碍劳动力流动:在空间距离上,劳动力偏好邻近城市,地理距离每增加1%,劳动力的流动机会比率降低约0.6%;在空间位置上,劳动力倾向于在方言文化相近的地域范围内流动,方言距离每增加1%,劳动力的流动机会比率下降2%左右。通过构造两地年均降水量差距和小麦种植适宜度差距作为方言距离的工具变量,以两阶段最小二乘法估计缓解内生性问题,估计显示结论稳健;考虑普通话因素后方言距离的抑制影响依然稳健,但目的地的高普通话普及率显著发挥促进劳动力流动的引力作用。最后,本文得出持续推广普通话、加强交通建设和深化中等教育的政策建议。

Abstract:

This paper studies the impacts of geographical distances and dialect difference on spatial mobility of labor in China in a systematic way by using Baidu big data. Based on a gravity model and the ordinary least square method(OLS), it is found that both geographical distance and dialect difference inhibit the labor mobility through construction of ratio of mobility opportunity. In terms of spatial distance, labor prefers to move to nearby cities. The ratio of labor mobility opportunity decreases by about 0.6% if the geographic distance increases by 1%. In terms of spatial location, labor is inclined to move to the areas in similar dialects. The ratio of labor mobility opportunity falls by around 2% if dialect difference is added by 1%. To alleviate the potential endogeneity, by constructing the gaps of rainfalls and wheat planting suitability between two cities chosen as instrumental variables for dialect difference, two stage least square method(2 SLS) shows the result is robust. Furthermore, taking into account the standard Mandarin, the inhibition effect by dialect difference is still robust while the high popularity of the standard Mandarin plays a significant gravity role in attracting labor mobility in the destination. It proposes that popularizing the standard Mandarin, expanding traffic construction and promoting secondary education be the options for policy makers.

参考文献

[1]李毅,刘雅楠,金勇进.基于复杂网络视角下省际人口迁移空间格局及趋势研究[J].统计研究,2017(9):56-64.

[2]李秦,孟岭生.方言、普通话与中国劳动力区域流动[J].经济学报,2014(4):68-84.

[3]刘毓芸,徐现祥,肖泽凯.劳动力跨方言流动的倒U型模式[J].经济研究,2015(10):134-146.

[4]Sjaastad L A. The Costs and Returns of Human Migration[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1962, 70(5):80-93.

[5]Falck O, et al. Dialects, Cultural Identity, and Economic Exchange[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2012, 72(2-3):225-239.

[6]Adsera A, Pytlikova M. The Role of Language in Shaping International Migration[J]. Economic Journal, 2015, 125(586):F49-F81.

[7]Chiswick B R, Miller P W. English Language Fluency Among Immigrants in the United States[A]. In Solomon W Polachek (ed.), Research in Labor Economics[C]. Oxford: JAI Press, 1998:151-200.

[8]Pendakur K, Pendakur R. Language as Both Human Capital and Ethnicity[J]. International Migration Review, 2002, 36(1):147-177.

[9]Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(3):1095-1131.

[10]金江,孟勇,张莉.劳动力跨方言区流动、自选择与劳动力收入[J].统计研究,2018(8):94-103.

[11]林建浩,赵子乐.均衡发展的隐形壁垒:方言、制度与技术扩散[J].经济研究,2017(9):182-197.

[12]Cheng C C. Measuring Relationship among Dialects: DOC and Related Resources[J]. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 1997, 2(1):41-72.

[13]周振鹤,游汝杰.方言与中国文化[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2015:34-45,120-130.

[14]李楠.文化因素对人口流动的长期影响:基于中国历史经验的实证分析[J].社会,2015(4):159-176.

[15]杜若甫,袁义达.中国姓氏的进化及不同方言区的姓氏频率[J].中国社会科学,1993(4):177-190.

[16]李如龙.汉语方言学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007:25-34.

[17]中国社会科学院,澳大利亚人文科学院.中国语言地图集[M].香港:香港朗文(远东)有限公司,1987.

[18]Talhelm T, et al. Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6184):603-608.

[19]竺可桢.中国近五千年来气候变迁的初步研究[J].考古学报,1972(1):15-38.

[20]Montiel Olea J L, Pflueger C. A Robust Test for Weak Instruments[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2013, 31(3):358-369.

[21]中国语言文字使用情况调查领导小组办公室.中国语言文字使用情况调查资料[M].北京:语文出版社,2006:25-26,127.

(1)此处衷心感谢匿名审稿人关于普通话的评论和建议。

(2)此处衷心感谢匿名审稿人关于非线性考虑的有益评论。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.03.008

中图分类号:H17;F249.2

引用信息:

[1]鲁永刚,张凯.地理距离、方言文化与劳动力空间流动[J].统计研究,2019,36(03):88-99.DOI:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.03.008.

基金信息:

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国经济特区创新驱动发展的金融支持研究”(14JJD790041)的资助

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文